Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auto results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 555 faulty-reasoning hits from 896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,291 of 16,442 topics). This Auto is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Auto
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.0% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles896 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.6%15.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos