Topic summary
9% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Author Interview results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 339 hits . Analysis detected 3,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,956 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,241 of 15,534 topics). This Author Interview is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Author Interview
Topic details
Total words: 5,956
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst