Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Austin History results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Austin History is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Austin History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,955
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos