Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Arts results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 2,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,835 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,856 of 16,562 topics). This Austin Arts is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Austin Arts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,835
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos