Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Augustine results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 3,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,565 of 16,562 topics). This Augustine is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Augustine
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠25%Augustine (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos