Topic summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos3,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atomic Bombings results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,119 hits. Analysis detected 8,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,668 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (18,153 of 23,837 topics). This Atomic Bombings is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Atomic Bombings
Topic details
Total words: 13,668
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos