Topic summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Athlete Injury results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 1,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 867 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,384 of 16,562 topics). This Athlete Injury is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Athlete Injury
Topic details
Total words: 867
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles867 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 26.9% 26.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst