Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video1,435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Athlete Career results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,305 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,703 of 16,562 topics). This Athlete Career is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
Athlete Career
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,305
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751005.2% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos