Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Asylum Fraud results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 866 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (8,292 of 21,989 topics). This Asylum Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Asylum Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 1,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.4%3.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos