Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video1,733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Astronaut Selection results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hindsight Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 799 hits. Analysis detected 2,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,616 of 16,559 topics). This Astronaut Selection is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Astronaut Selection
Topic details
Total words: 6,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos