Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Astrology results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 6,749 hits. Analysis detected 20,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,039 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,391 of 15,765 topics). This Astrology is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Astrology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 15,039
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 44.9%44.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 31.6%31.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.6%14.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Topic 44.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 31.6%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos