Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Asthma results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 1,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,682 of 16,504 topics). This Asthma is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Asthma
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos