Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Asian American Studies results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,155 hits. Analysis detected 5,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Asian American Studies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Asian American Studies
Topic details
Total words: 8,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos