Topic summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artificial Intelligence In Finance results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 2,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,346 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,633 of 16,562 topics). This Artificial Intelligence In Finance is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Artificial Intelligence In Finance
Topic details
Total words: 2,346
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.5%8.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos