Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artificial Intelligence Impact results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 2,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,927 of 16,562 topics). This Artificial Intelligence Impact is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Artificial Intelligence Impact
Topic details
Total words: 3,384
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos