Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,027 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arthurian Legend results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 1,102 hits. Analysis detected 3,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (8,592 of 22,909 topics). This Arthurian Legend is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Arthurian Legend
Topic details
Total words: 4,108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.8%26.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos