Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Argentina National Team results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Bandwagon, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 2,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 942 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (924 of 16,562 topics). This Argentina National Team is worse (more manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Argentina National Team
Topic details
Total words: 942
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510094.4% percentile
11.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles942 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 31.9%31.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 21.4%21.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.6%18.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 37.9%37.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.1%16.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 37.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 31.9%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos