Topic summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video1,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Argentina Football Team results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 1,130 hits. Analysis detected 3,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,279 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,671 of 16,562 topics). This Argentina Football Team is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Argentina Football Team
Topic details
Total words: 3,279
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 34.5%34.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 34.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos