Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video2,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Archival Research results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 3,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,519 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,156 of 16,562 topics). This Archival Research is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Archival Research
Topic details
Total words: 6,519
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos