Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Tv+ results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 2,214 hits. Analysis detected 9,936 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,245 of 16,562 topics). This Apple Tv+ is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Apple Tv+
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,396
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.4%26.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.5%10.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos