Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apology results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 628 hits . Analysis detected 3,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,040 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,160 of 16,562 topics). This Apology is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Apology
Topic details
Total words: 6,040
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst