Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video1,183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apollo Program results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hindsight Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 2,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,418 of 16,559 topics). This Apollo Program is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Apollo Program
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos