Topic summary
64%2 analyzed articles/videos493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apis results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 3,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,842 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,979 of 16,562 topics). This Apis is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Apis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,842
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos