Topic summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video1,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antitrust Regulations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 3,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,420 of 16,562 topics). This Antitrust Regulations is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Antitrust Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 3,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.2%7.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos