Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Annie Andrews results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 328 hits. Analysis detected 3,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,725 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Annie Andrews is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Annie Andrews
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,725
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos