Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Animal Research results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 237 hits . Analysis detected 1,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,277 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Research is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Animal Research
Topic details
Total words: 2,277
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst