Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Abuse results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 2,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,067 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Abuse is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Animal Abuse
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos