Topic summary
⁠48%3 analyzed articles/videos1,899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Android Auto results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 654 hits. Analysis detected 6,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,697 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,602 of 15,979 topics). This Android Auto is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Android Auto
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,697
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos