Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andes Mountains results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 54.1% saturation with 1,866 hits. Analysis detected 3,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,957 of 16,562 topics). This Andes Mountains is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Andes Mountains
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 54.1%54.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 54.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos