Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anant Ambani results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 343 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,261 of 16,559 topics). This Anant Ambani is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Anant Ambani
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos