Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amtrak Cascades results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Burden of Proof, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 310 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (11,962 of 22,836 topics). This Amtrak Cascades is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Amtrak Cascades
Topic details
Total words: 1,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.7%2.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.7%2.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos