Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amoco results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,369 hits. Analysis detected 9,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,424 of 16,562 topics). This Amoco is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Amoco
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos