Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ambassador Recall results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 63.6% saturation with 929 hits. Analysis detected 4,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,461 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (453 of 16,562 topics). This Ambassador Recall is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Ambassador Recall
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,461
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510097.3% percentile
16.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 63.6%63.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 54.8%54.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 27.4%27.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 34.4%34.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 16.1%16.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 10.9%10.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.9%19.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 63.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 54.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 34.4%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.4%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Red Herring: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos