Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Amazon Leo results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 1,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Amazon Leo is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Amazon Leo
Topic details
Total words: 1,108
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Representativeness Heuris⌠Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Composition/Division: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst