Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alzheimer's Disease Risk Factors results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 1,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,621 of 16,562 topics). This Alzheimer's Disease Risk Factors is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Alzheimer's Disease Risk Factors
Topic details
Total words: 4,556
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos