Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alan Jackson results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,073 hits. Analysis detected 5,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,692 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,936 of 16,562 topics). This Alan Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Alan Jackson
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,692
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.9%13.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos