Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alabama Crimson Tide results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 1,288 hits. Analysis detected 10,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,984 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,051 of 16,562 topics). This Alabama Crimson Tide is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Alabama Crimson Tide
Topic details
Total words: 4,984
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.8%25.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.6%18.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.7%19.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos