Topic summary
69% 1 analyzed article/video 368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Airspace Security results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 194 hits . Analysis detected 1,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,302 of 16,562 topics). This Airspace Security is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group. Airspace Security
Topic details
Total words: 1,104
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.0% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst