Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Tools results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 3,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,494 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,079 of 16,562 topics). This AI Tools is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
AI Tools
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,494
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.0%15.0%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.0%18.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos