Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Security Risks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 2,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,251 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Security Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Ai Security Risks
Topic details
Total words: 2,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 14.8%14.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos