Topic summary
⁠66%3 analyzed articles/videos1,068 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Incidents results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 472 hits. Analysis detected 5,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,834 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,245 of 15,585 topics). This AI Incidents is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
AI Incidents
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,834
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos