Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ai In Transportation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Ai In Transportation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ai In Transportation
Topic details
Total words: 4,740
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos