Topic summary
⁠37%2 analyzed articles/videos1,719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI In Security results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 517 hits. Analysis detected 3,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,157 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,229 of 16,562 topics). This AI In Security is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
AI In Security
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,157
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos