Topic summary
13% 2 analyzed articles/videos 5,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Robotics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,521 hits . Analysis detected 5,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,654 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,353 of 15,769 topics). This Ai In Robotics is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group. Ai In Robotics
Topic details
Total words: 15,654
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.6% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst