Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These AI In Environmental Monitoring results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 1,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,418 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This AI In Environmental Monitoring is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
AI In Environmental Monitoring
Topic details
Total words: 2,418
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos