Topic summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI In Drug Discovery results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 1,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,740 of 16,562 topics). This AI In Drug Discovery is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
AI In Drug Discovery
Topic details
Total words: 1,336
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos