Topic summary
14% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Cybersecurity results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 1,437 hits . Analysis detected 14,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,400 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,641 of 15,582 topics). This Ai In Cybersecurity is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Ai In Cybersecurity
Topic details
Total words: 21,400
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst