Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Agriculture results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 716 faulty-reasoning hits from 920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,554 of 16,562 topics). This Ai In Agriculture is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Ai In Agriculture
Topic details
Total words: 920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles920 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.8%15.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos