Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video1,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Detection Tools results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 3,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,482 of 16,559 topics). This AI Detection Tools is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
AI Detection Tools
Topic details
Total words: 3,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.8%16.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 16.6%16.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos