Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Copyright Lawsuits results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,113 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,966 of 16,562 topics). This AI Copyright Lawsuits is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
AI Copyright Lawsuits
Topic details
Total words: 1,113
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.2%12.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.9%14.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos